top The 10 Best Low-SAR Phones September 2016

Top 10 Best Low-sar Phones 2016



This top rated low-SAR phone list doesn't just list low-SAR phones, it reports on the best phones in that category.

Methodology
We start with a list of the top rated cell phones and we keep only the cell phones which fit one of these two situation:

  1. A low ear SAR value of no more than 0.66 W/kg.
  2. A body SAR rating of less than 0.67 W/kg.
The best phones that meet these critieria are then presented from the top rated to the lowest rated cell phone.

#1. The Samsung Galaxy J3

Samsung Galaxy J3 picture.
Average Rating:
90%


Description:

With cons like an elementary 1.2GHz quad-core CPU and a 1.5GB RAM that could have been bumped up to 2GB, the LTE-ready Galaxy J3 is shaping up to be a mildly-specked 5-inch HD Super AMOLED Samsung phone. (Full pros and cons...)

SAR-related specs:

    Ear SAR value: 0.618 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 0.304 w/Kg

More:




#2. The LG Optimus Zone 3

A picture of the LG Optimus Zone 3.
Average Rating:
78%


Description:

Though its specs aren't as out-of-the-box as we had hoped, the LG Optimus Zone 3 (initially carried by Verizon) potentially turns out to be a passable prepaid Android. (Full pros and cons...)

SAR-related features:

    Ear SAR value: 0.18 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 0.13 w/Kg

More:


Don't Choose The Wrong Phone!

Let Us Find Your Perfect Phone!

Our quick Celliminator cell phone finder tells you your best phone in less than a minute. Try it now or start here with the first question:

Question #1: Should it be a smartphone or not?

A) Smartphones only.
B) Regular, "dumb" phone only. No smartphones please!

#3. The Yezz Andy 5T

Yezz Andy 5T picture.
Average Rating:
74%


Description:

After checking out its features and specs, the Yezz Andy 5T yields a somewhat-intriguing mix of pros and cons for us. This phone takes the stage with a 13-megapixel main camera and a 5-megapixel selfie camera , but displays its photos on a rather-small 5-inch screen that has a 1280 x 720 resolution . (Full pros and cons...)

SAR-related specs:

    Ear SAR value: 0.278 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 0.255 w/Kg

More:

#4. The Wiko Pulp

Photo of the Wiko Pulp.
Average Rating:
80%


Description:

Compared to full-blown high-end Androids, this 5-inch 3G-only (it promises a mere 21Mbps maximum data rate) model will likely be beaten to a pulp, but most of its specifications sound just about right for the mid-tier market. That said, we cannot help but wish that it had a Full HD (1080p) display, instead of HD (720p) , as the former would make more sense for its hardware. (Full pros and cons...)

SAR-specific features:

    Ear SAR value: 0.332 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 0.455 w/Kg

More:

#5. The LG B470

A picture of the LG B470.
Average Rating:
100%


Description:

Though we caught a couple of cons in its lack of microSD support and run-of-the-mill 950mAh battery capacity , the LG B470's pros make it a rather acceptable 2016 Q1 flip phone. Its selling points include a 1.3-megapixel camera , which anyone would appreciate over the sub-standard VGA camera type, and a 3G UMTS network connectivity (some similar models settle for basic 2G). (Full pros and cons...)

SAR-specific specifications:

    Ear SAR value: 0.47 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 0.56 w/Kg

More:

#6. The Wiko Fever

A picture of the Wiko Fever.
Average Rating:
80%


Description:

A phone that was probably inspired by the spring fever, the Wiko Fever boasts a glow-in-the-dark effect (phosphorescent lining) plus a leather-like finish, though its list of specs did not escape our keen eyes when it comes to pros and cons. (Full pros and cons...)

SAR-related features:

    Ear SAR value: 0.236 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 0.573 w/Kg

More:

#7. The vivo Y15S

A picture of the vivo Y15S.
Average Rating:
96%


Description:

Running on vivo's signature Funtouch OS (version 2.1) , which is based on Android 5.1 Lollipop, the 4.5-inch (854 x 480) vivo Y15S tries to give the typical entry-level formula a slight twist, with pros like an up-to-128GB external memory support as well as the Smart Wake swipe-to-command feature. That being said, it almost feels weird not seeing 4G LTE on the pros and cons list of a 2015 pitch from vivo. We also find its 1900mAh battery power somewhat underwhelming, knowing that many other budget-class Androids (as of its release) have 2000mAh or higher in the tank. Its 5- and 2-megapixel cameras don't thrill us, either. (Full pros and cons...)

SAR-specific features:

    Ear SAR value: 0.62 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 0.59 w/Kg

More:

#8. The Samsung Galaxy J1 Duos

Photo of the Samsung Galaxy J1 Duos.
Average Rating:
80%


Description:

Merely a version of Samsung's entry-level Galaxy J1 rigged with an extra SIM card slot , the Samsung Galaxy J1 Duos shares its base model's cons, including a 3G-only network reach (though there is a J1 4G variant), a WVGA-480p 4.3-inch display , and a two-core-only 1.2GHz processor (only 512MB of RAM). It also does not go beyond 1850mAh of battery power , despite the average as of its release standing at roughly 2000mAh. (Full pros and cons...)

SAR-specific features:

    Ear SAR value: 0.539 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 0.334 w/Kg

More:

#9. The SpareOne Emergency Phone

A picture of the SpareOne Emergency Phone.
Average Rating:
60%


Description:

As made clear by its name, the SpareOne Emergency Phone (3G) is an emergency handset that never has to charge up, because it runs on two AA lithium batteries . Also, while it does not sport a screen nor any camera , which are staple specs in the mobile world, this simple device comes with a Locate and Alert button that calls up five personally-set guardians during emergencies. (Full pros and cons...)

SAR-specific specifications:

    Ear SAR value: 0.084 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 0.11 w/Kg

More:

#10. The LG G4 Dual-LTE

Photo of the LG G4 Dual-LTE.
Average Rating:
94%


Description:

The LG G4 Dual-LTE is very much like the G4, but with a few nifty touches to its premium-class set of pros and cons. (Full pros and cons...)

SAR-related specs:

    Ear SAR value: 0.542 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 0.453 w/Kg

More:



You Should Also Be Interested In These:

 
Full Menu
Privacy Policy  •  Our Mission  •  Contact Us
Copyright 2009-2016 Phonerated.com