Top 10 Best Low-sar Phones 2018

This page is offered ad-free, in exchange for "Check Price" buttons to lead to stores you know, which pay us a commission that has no effect on your price. Items are chosen regardless of price by our review crawler and commented by human analysts. Learn about our constantly-updating ranking system

This top rated low-SAR phone list doesn't just list low-SAR phones, it reports on the best phones in that category.

MethodologyWe start with a list of the top rated cell phones and we keep only the cell phones which fit one of these two situation:

  1. As of 2017, we set the low ear SAR value to no more than 0.86 W/kg.
  2. ...And we removed the minimum for body SAR rating, assuming that users worried about cell phone radiation are mostly concerned with the effect it may have on their brain.
Consequently, the best phones that meet these critieria are then presented from the top rated to the lowest rated cell phone.

#1. The LG Q6

LG Q6 picture.
Average Rating:
76%


Description:

Majority of this phablet's specs, like its 1.4GHz processor, 5-megapixel wide-angle selfie cam, and 3GB RAM, are comfortably-mid-range -- but its 5.5-inch FullVision display gives it a somewhat premium-like character

SAR-related features:

    Ear SAR value: 0.277 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 1.54 w/Kg

More:




#2. The samsung galaxy j7 pro

samsung galaxy j7 pro picture.
Average Rating:
75%


Description:

The Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro hopes that its combo of a 3600mAh battery and two 13-megapixel cameras is enough to convince the phone photography-loving crowd, and at the same time, to potentially distract from its less-than-impressive 1.6GHz processor specs.

SAR-related specs:

    Ear SAR value: 0.567 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 1.33 w/Kg

More:


Don't Choose The Wrong Phone!

Let Us Find Your Perfect Phone!

Our quick Celliminator cell phone finder tells you your best phone in less than a minute. Try it now or start here with the first question:

Question #1: Should it be a smartphone or not?

A) Smartphones only.
B) Regular, "dumb" phone only. No smartphones please!

#3. The Samsung J7 Max

Photo of the Samsung J7 Max.
Average Rating:
74%


Description:

The Samsung Galaxy J7 Max's 13-megapixel cameras, 3300mAh battery, and 1080p display are all respectable specs, but they don't carry the same star power as its octa-core processor, which has a maximum speed of 2.39GHz.

SAR-specific features:

    Ear SAR value: 0.71 w/Kg

More:

#4. The LG X venture

A picture of the LG X venture.
Average Rating:
84%


Description:

The LG X venture, which is IP68 dust and water-resistant and MIL-STD-810G shock-resistant, sports higher-end specs -- like a 16-megapixel main shooter (although the 5-megapixel selfie cam is unimpressive), a 4100mAh battery, and a sophisticated-looking 0.36in-thick exterior -- compared to the usual rugged phone.

SAR-specific specifications:

    Ear SAR value: 0.64 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 1.28 w/Kg

More:

#5. The Ulefone Power

Photo of the Ulefone Power.
Average Rating:
62%


Description:

Ulefone's Power is a power-oriented eight-core smartphone that offers a colossal 6050mAh battery scoring up to 63 hours of talk time (75-day standby time) alongside fingerprint identification and 3GB's worth of RAM.

SAR-related features:

    Ear SAR value: 0.323 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 0.807 w/Kg

More:

#6. The LG V30 Plus

A picture of the LG V30 Plus.
Average Rating:
71%


Description:

The LG V30 Plus has a collection of top-of-the-line specs like a 6-inch 2880-pixel by 1440-pixel FullVision display, 16-megapixel + 13-megapixel cameras on its rear, and an IP68 rating against dust and water, but its 5-megapixel selfie shooter and 3300mAh battery make it appear like a less-premium smartphone.

SAR-specific specifications:

    Ear SAR value: 0.71 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 1.20 w/Kg

More:

#7. The Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4

Photo of the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4.
Average Rating:
70%


Description:

The Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4 positions itself as one of the lightest and thinnest highly-rugged smartphones there are, with a 9.7mm-thick, 172-gram body that boasts specs like an IP68 water and dust-proof rating and MIL-STD-810G certification against shock, vibrations, and extreme temperature.

SAR-specific features:

    Ear SAR value: 0.51 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 0.63 w/Kg

More:

#8. The Yezz Andy 5T

A picture of the Yezz Andy 5T.
Average Rating:
64%


Description:

Aside from its low 0.255 body SAR rating and 0.278 head SAR rating, the Andy 5T phone's other noteworthy takeaways are its 13.1-megapixel main camera and 5-megapixel front-facing camera, but we cannot disregard its other so-so specs, such as a 1.3GHz quad-core CPU, 1GB of RAM, and 8GB of memory.

SAR-specific features:

    Ear SAR value: 0.278 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 0.255 w/Kg

More:

#9. The ZTE Max Duo LTE

Photo of the ZTE Max Duo LTE.
Average Rating:
66%


Description:

ZTE's Max Duo phablet delivers a 6-inch Full HD Gorilla Glass screen, dual rear cameras (13- and 2-megapixel cams), and a 1.5GHz eight-core engine aided by a 2GB RAM.

SAR-related features:

    Ear SAR value: 0.25 (* This is for the CDMA version Z962VL. The SAR value is 0.46w/Kg for the GSM version Z962BL) w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 1.18 (* This is for the CDMA version. The body SAR value is 1.19w/Kg for the GSM version) w/Kg

More:

#10. The HTC One X10

HTC One X10 picture.
Average Rating:
60%


Description:

Of all this phone's specs, its clear that HTC's priority has been imaging specs (shown by the 16MP rear cam and the 8MP selfie cam) and the 3000mAh battery, considering that its 3GB RAM is relatively-low and that its Helio P10 processor runs at a maximum speed of only 1.8GHz.

SAR-related specs:

    Ear SAR value: 0.418 w/Kg
    Body SAR Rating: 0.665 w/Kg

More:



You Should Also Check These Out:

* Prices shown are only indicative. They were recently fetched by our system and may have changed meanwhile.

X

Your Compare List




X
Full Menu
Privacy Policy  •  Our Mission  •  Contact Us
Copyright 2009-2018 Phonerated.com